Todd Rundgren Calls Taylor Swift the 'Apotheosis of Mediocrity' and Says She Ruined Music
The rock musician argues that the pop star lacks talent as a singer, songwriter, or dancer in recent comments.
Headline and summary written by an AI model from the linked articles; not reviewed by a person. How this was made
First reported by RSS: News, 1h 47m ahead of the next publisher · who breaks stories first
This story has stopped developing; this page is its permanent record. More from that day
The odds
Each tick is a source publishing on this story
Price data
| Time | Chance of yes |
|---|---|
| now | 1% |
| 4 Oct, 01:07 UTC | 1% |
| 4 Oct, 00:15 UTC | 2% |
| 3 Oct, 23:16 UTC | 2% |
| 3 Oct, 21:43 UTC | 2% |
| 3 Oct, 20:17 UTC | 1% |
| 3 Oct, 19:09 UTC | 2% |
| 3 Oct, 17:49 UTC | 2% |
| 3 Oct, 14:13 UTC | 1% |
| 3 Oct, 11:47 UTC | 2% |
| 3 Oct, 11:21 UTC | 1% |
| 3 Oct, 10:10 UTC | 2% |
| 3 Oct, 07:57 UTC | 1% |
| 3 Oct, 07:13 UTC | 2% |
| 3 Oct, 04:24 UTC | 1% |
| 3 Oct, 02:09 UTC | 2% |
| 2 Oct, 17:11 UTC | 1% |
| 2 Oct, 04:28 UTC | 2% |
| 2 Oct, 01:33 UTC | 2% |
| 2 Oct, 01:20 UTC | 1% |
| 2 Oct, 00:03 UTC | 2% |
| 1 Oct, 23:38 UTC | 1% |
| 1 Oct, 14:21 UTC | 2% |
| 1 Oct, 07:09 UTC | 1% |
| 1 Oct, 05:40 UTC | 2% |
| 1 Oct, 05:20 UTC | 2% |
| 1 Oct, 03:41 UTC | 1% |
| 1 Oct, 02:57 UTC | 2% |
| 30 Sept, 23:39 UTC | 3% |
| 30 Sept, 22:37 UTC | 2% |
| 30 Sept, 17:28 UTC | 3% |
| 30 Sept, 16:36 UTC | 2% |
| 30 Sept, 16:09 UTC | 5% |
| 30 Sept, 14:50 UTC | 4% |
| 30 Sept, 13:57 UTC | 5% |
| 30 Sept, 11:03 UTC | 4% |
| 30 Sept, 07:44 UTC | 1% |
| 30 Sept, 04:13 UTC | 4% |
| 30 Sept, 01:44 UTC | 2% |
| 29 Sept, 22:45 UTC | 3% |
| 29 Sept, 15:08 UTC | 4% |
| 29 Sept, 13:35 UTC | 3% |
| 29 Sept, 12:48 UTC | 3% |
| 29 Sept, 07:02 UTC | 4% |
| 29 Sept, 05:53 UTC | 5% |
| 28 Sept, 19:18 UTC | 6% |
| 28 Sept, 14:06 UTC | 5% |
| 28 Sept, 13:30 UTC | 6% |
| 28 Sept, 13:04 UTC | 7% |
| 28 Sept, 12:04 UTC | 9% |
| 28 Sept, 11:17 UTC | 12% |
| 28 Sept, 10:35 UTC | 8% |
| 28 Sept, 08:38 UTC | 10% |
| 28 Sept, 07:26 UTC | 9% |
| 28 Sept, 06:36 UTC | 15% |
| 28 Sept, 05:03 UTC | 13% |
| 28 Sept, 04:46 UTC | 11% |
| 28 Sept, 04:15 UTC | 12% |
| 28 Sept, 03:34 UTC | 14% |
| 28 Sept, 02:48 UTC | 16% |
| 28 Sept, 02:25 UTC | 15% |
| 28 Sept, 01:36 UTC | 19% |
| 28 Sept, 01:28 UTC | 16% |
| 28 Sept, 00:22 UTC | 13% |
| 27 Sept, 23:37 UTC | 18% |
| 27 Sept, 21:43 UTC | 17% |
| 27 Sept, 20:36 UTC | 12% |
| 27 Sept, 19:59 UTC | 13% |
| 27 Sept, 18:51 UTC | 16% |
| 27 Sept, 18:20 UTC | 12% |
| 27 Sept, 17:31 UTC | 19% |
| 27 Sept, 17:06 UTC | 16% |
| 27 Sept, 16:52 UTC | 16% |
| 27 Sept, 16:23 UTC | 17% |
| 27 Sept, 15:52 UTC | 16% |
| 27 Sept, 15:24 UTC | 14% |
| 27 Sept, 14:38 UTC | 23% |
| 27 Sept, 14:03 UTC | 13% |
| 27 Sept, 09:30 UTC | 27% |
| 27 Sept, 08:15 UTC | 35% |
| 27 Sept, 06:54 UTC | 31% |
| 27 Sept, 05:36 UTC | 33% |
| 27 Sept, 04:25 UTC | 25% |
| 27 Sept, 03:46 UTC | 30% |
| 27 Sept, 03:19 UTC | 32% |
| 27 Sept, 02:58 UTC | 32% |
| 27 Sept, 01:17 UTC | 29% |
| 27 Sept, 00:42 UTC | 31% |
| 26 Sept, 23:34 UTC | 30% |
| 26 Sept, 23:25 UTC | 35% |
| 26 Sept, 22:14 UTC | 30% |
| 26 Sept, 19:56 UTC | 27% |
| 26 Sept, 19:16 UTC | 30% |
| 26 Sept, 18:59 UTC | 24% |
| 26 Sept, 18:26 UTC | 30% |
| 26 Sept, 17:23 UTC | 27% |
| 26 Sept, 16:48 UTC | 25% |
| 26 Sept, 16:03 UTC | 28% |
| 26 Sept, 15:31 UTC | 26% |
| 26 Sept, 15:15 UTC | 25% |
| 26 Sept, 14:37 UTC | 20% |
| 26 Sept, 14:10 UTC | 16% |
| 26 Sept, 13:50 UTC | 15% |
| 26 Sept, 13:06 UTC | 26% |
| 26 Sept, 10:50 UTC | 25% |
| 26 Sept, 08:02 UTC | 26% |
| 26 Sept, 06:40 UTC | 18% |
| 26 Sept, 06:25 UTC | 21% |
| 26 Sept, 05:08 UTC | 24% |
| 26 Sept, 04:36 UTC | 23% |
| 26 Sept, 03:53 UTC | 20% |
| 26 Sept, 03:16 UTC | 17% |
| 26 Sept, 02:24 UTC | 22% |
| 26 Sept, 01:37 UTC | 23% |
| 26 Sept, 00:56 UTC | 25% |
| 25 Sept, 23:08 UTC | 26% |
| 25 Sept, 22:54 UTC | 27% |
| 25 Sept, 22:22 UTC | 25% |
| 25 Sept, 21:34 UTC | 27% |
| 25 Sept, 21:27 UTC | 27% |
| 25 Sept, 20:25 UTC | 36% |
| 25 Sept, 19:53 UTC | 29% |
| 25 Sept, 19:25 UTC | 32% |
| 25 Sept, 18:43 UTC | 37% |
| 25 Sept, 18:14 UTC | 39% |
| 25 Sept, 17:34 UTC | 42% |
| 25 Sept, 17:27 UTC | 33% |
| 25 Sept, 16:58 UTC | 32% |
| 25 Sept, 16:19 UTC | 30% |
| 25 Sept, 15:57 UTC | 30% |
| 25 Sept, 14:54 UTC | 38% |
| 25 Sept, 14:25 UTC | 41% |
| 25 Sept, 13:54 UTC | 48% |
| 25 Sept, 13:11 UTC | 43% |
| 25 Sept, 12:38 UTC | 40% |
| 25 Sept, 11:48 UTC | 39% |
| 25 Sept, 11:04 UTC | 35% |
| 25 Sept, 10:57 UTC | 40% |
| 25 Sept, 07:49 UTC | 36% |
| 25 Sept, 07:14 UTC | 38% |
| 25 Sept, 06:54 UTC | 37% |
| 25 Sept, 06:17 UTC | 40% |
| 25 Sept, 05:43 UTC | 41% |
| 25 Sept, 05:24 UTC | 45% |
| 25 Sept, 04:35 UTC | 63% |
| 25 Sept, 04:11 UTC | 77% |
| 25 Sept, 03:50 UTC | 80% |
| 25 Sept, 03:24 UTC | 79% |
| 25 Sept, 01:46 UTC | 81% |
| 25 Sept, 00:59 UTC | 80% |
| 24 Sept, 23:39 UTC | 78% |
| 24 Sept, 22:24 UTC | 77% |
| 24 Sept, 21:46 UTC | 78% |
| 24 Sept, 20:24 UTC | 81% |
| 24 Sept, 19:56 UTC | 72% |
| 24 Sept, 19:17 UTC | 72% |
| 24 Sept, 18:41 UTC | 74% |
| 24 Sept, 17:42 UTC | 70% |
| 24 Sept, 17:27 UTC | 73% |
| 24 Sept, 16:18 UTC | 70% |
| 24 Sept, 15:25 UTC | 69% |
| 24 Sept, 14:18 UTC | 70% |
| 24 Sept, 13:03 UTC | 70% |
| 24 Sept, 12:42 UTC | 66% |
| 24 Sept, 04:01 UTC | 70% |
| 24 Sept, 03:13 UTC | 69% |
| 24 Sept, 02:05 UTC | 68% |
| 24 Sept, 01:08 UTC | 65% |
| 23 Sept, 23:27 UTC | 77% |
| 23 Sept, 22:55 UTC | 83% |
| 23 Sept, 22:20 UTC | 79% |
| 23 Sept, 21:43 UTC | 87% |
| 22 Sept, 20:42 UTC | 0% |
Replay the odds, article by article
Step through each article in the order it published and watch Exactly Yes respond.
The story so far
6 publishers have covered this in 6 articles since 25 Sept 2026. RSS: News published first, on 25 September at 16:27 UTC; Consequence followed 1h 48m later. The most recent article, from Variety, appeared on 29 September at 02:04 UTC.
Outlets reporting it: Variety (major outlet), RSS: News, Consequence, Stereogum, NME, Billboard.
3 prediction markets price this story:
- Exactly Yes — resolved “No” on 6 Oct 2026. The market resolves to Yes if exactly four unique songs credited to Taylor Swift appear in the top four spots on the Billboard Hot 100 chart for the week of October 10, 2026. It resolves to No if that specific condition is not met. Readers often mistake the linked news story about her wedding ring as relevant to the resolution, but only the Billboard chart data determines the outcome.
- At least 3 weeks — resolved “Yes” on 11 Oct 2026. The outcome is Yes if Taylor Swift holds the number one spot on the Billboard 200 chart for a total of at least three weeks during 2026. The outcome is No if she fails to reach that duration within that calendar year. Readers often mistake the requirement for consecutive weeks, but the rule allows for non-consecutive time.
- Taylor Swift — resolved “Yes” on 6 Oct 2026. The market resolves to Yes if Taylor Swift holds the top spot on the Billboard 200 chart at any point before December 26, 2026. It resolves to No if she does not achieve this ranking by that deadline. Readers often mistake the announcement of a new single or album for the required chart position.
Odds are the market's probability that the outcome happens, updated every few minutes. They are information about what traders expect, not a forecast we make and not investment advice.
How it unfolded
Every source in the order it published, with the odds on Exactly Yes at that moment. A dash means the source published before we started tracking prices.
- RSS: NewsTodd Rundgren: Taylor Swift Ruined Music30%
- ConsequenceTodd Rundgren Says Taylor Swift “Ruined Music,” Calls Her “Apotheosis of Mediocrity”39%▲9 points since the previous source
- StereogumTodd Rundgren Says Taylor Swift “Ruined Music,” “Not A Great Songwriter”39%
- NMETodd Rundgren claims that Taylor Swift “ruined music” and calls her the “apotheosis of mediocrity”27%▼11 points since the previous source
- BillboardProducer Todd Rundgren Criticizes Taylor Swift: ‘The Apotheosis of Mediocrity’13%▼14 points since the previous source
- VarietyTodd Rundgren Slams Taylor Swift, Says She ‘Ruined Music’ and Is ‘the Apotheosis of Mediocrity’6%▼7 points since the previous source
- Market resolved: No
Sources
Every article we clustered into this story. Headlines link to the publisher.
- Todd Rundgren Slams Taylor Swift, Says She ‘Ruined Music’ and Is ‘the Apotheosis of Mediocrity’ Variety ·
- Producer Todd Rundgren Criticizes Taylor Swift: ‘The Apotheosis of Mediocrity’ Billboard
- Todd Rundgren claims that Taylor Swift “ruined music” and calls her the “apotheosis of mediocrity” NME
- Todd Rundgren Says Taylor Swift “Ruined Music,” “Not A Great Songwriter” Stereogum
- Todd Rundgren Says Taylor Swift “Ruined Music,” Calls Her “Apotheosis of Mediocrity” Consequence
- Todd Rundgren: Taylor Swift Ruined Music RSS: News
Related prediction markets
Linked by software because they are about the same subject. Most ask a different question from the one this story reports, so read each market's own question. How often the link is right
- Resolved Exactly Yes No 32d ago
The market favoured No at 99% a day out, and it won. How often it's right
Wrong market?
- Resolved At least 3 weeks Yes 27d ago
The market favoured Yes at 99% a day out, and it won. How often it's right
Wrong market?
- Resolved Taylor Swift Yes 32d ago
The market favoured Yes at 99% a day out, and it won. How often it's right
Wrong market?
In this story
- Todd Rundgren
- Taylor Swift