Tom Cruise Film Digger Set For $245m Box Office Loss
The eco-satire directed by Alejandro G Iñárritu is projected to lose $245 million after a 60% drop in its second weekend.
Headline and summary written by an AI model from the linked articles; not reviewed by a person. How this was made
This story has stopped developing; this page is its permanent record. More from that day
The odds
Each tick is a source publishing on this story
Price data
| Time | Chance of yes |
|---|---|
| now | 30% |
| 14 Oct, 06:49 UTC | 30% |
| 14 Oct, 06:29 UTC | 36% |
| 14 Oct, 02:35 UTC | 37% |
| 14 Oct, 00:07 UTC | 34% |
| 13 Oct, 23:53 UTC | 31% |
| 13 Oct, 21:24 UTC | 35% |
| 13 Oct, 19:45 UTC | 34% |
| 13 Oct, 19:18 UTC | 36% |
| 13 Oct, 18:57 UTC | 35% |
| 13 Oct, 16:33 UTC | 33% |
| 13 Oct, 16:11 UTC | 30% |
| 13 Oct, 15:57 UTC | 35% |
| 13 Oct, 15:24 UTC | 32% |
| 13 Oct, 14:35 UTC | 36% |
| 13 Oct, 12:08 UTC | 33% |
| 13 Oct, 10:22 UTC | 24% |
| 13 Oct, 05:48 UTC | 31% |
| 13 Oct, 04:48 UTC | 29% |
| 13 Oct, 03:48 UTC | 28% |
| 13 Oct, 02:34 UTC | 24% |
| 13 Oct, 02:14 UTC | 26% |
| 12 Oct, 20:43 UTC | 23% |
| 12 Oct, 11:32 UTC | 22% |
| 11 Oct, 23:43 UTC | 23% |
| 11 Oct, 19:33 UTC | 24% |
| 11 Oct, 19:24 UTC | 22% |
| 11 Oct, 17:48 UTC | 22% |
| 11 Oct, 15:40 UTC | 19% |
| 11 Oct, 04:09 UTC | 23% |
| 11 Oct, 03:26 UTC | 23% |
| 10 Oct, 20:53 UTC | 19% |
| 10 Oct, 19:50 UTC | 23% |
| 10 Oct, 18:14 UTC | 20% |
| 10 Oct, 16:48 UTC | 23% |
| 10 Oct, 07:30 UTC | 19% |
| 10 Oct, 05:00 UTC | 22% |
| 10 Oct, 03:53 UTC | 20% |
| 10 Oct, 03:13 UTC | 23% |
| 10 Oct, 00:39 UTC | 19% |
| 10 Oct, 00:12 UTC | 21% |
| 9 Oct, 12:38 UTC | 17% |
| 9 Oct, 08:09 UTC | 13% |
| 9 Oct, 03:20 UTC | 15% |
| 8 Oct, 23:42 UTC | 14% |
| 8 Oct, 23:03 UTC | 11% |
| 8 Oct, 21:20 UTC | 16% |
| 8 Oct, 20:34 UTC | 15% |
| 8 Oct, 19:39 UTC | 11% |
| 8 Oct, 15:36 UTC | 14% |
| 8 Oct, 13:43 UTC | 15% |
| 8 Oct, 12:38 UTC | 13% |
| 8 Oct, 09:59 UTC | 16% |
| 8 Oct, 03:08 UTC | 15% |
| 8 Oct, 02:40 UTC | 13% |
| 7 Oct, 08:40 UTC | 16% |
| 7 Oct, 00:35 UTC | 18% |
| 6 Oct, 20:30 UTC | 13% |
| 6 Oct, 17:53 UTC | 25% |
| 6 Oct, 09:48 UTC | 9% |
| 6 Oct, 02:30 UTC | 13% |
| 5 Oct, 15:42 UTC | 15% |
| 4 Oct, 21:31 UTC | 17% |
| 4 Oct, 20:38 UTC | 15% |
| 4 Oct, 19:59 UTC | 17% |
| 4 Oct, 18:07 UTC | 14% |
| 4 Oct, 17:27 UTC | 16% |
| 4 Oct, 14:21 UTC | 15% |
| 4 Oct, 13:24 UTC | 14% |
| 3 Oct, 21:10 UTC | 16% |
| 3 Oct, 19:42 UTC | 15% |
| 3 Oct, 17:07 UTC | 16% |
| 3 Oct, 16:07 UTC | 13% |
| 3 Oct, 12:49 UTC | 14% |
| 3 Oct, 07:13 UTC | 15% |
| 3 Oct, 06:53 UTC | 16% |
| 3 Oct, 03:25 UTC | 16% |
| 3 Oct, 01:28 UTC | 12% |
| 2 Oct, 22:57 UTC | 14% |
| 2 Oct, 21:42 UTC | 15% |
| 2 Oct, 20:25 UTC | 11% |
| 2 Oct, 19:30 UTC | 13% |
| 2 Oct, 17:04 UTC | 11% |
| 2 Oct, 15:51 UTC | 13% |
| 2 Oct, 09:59 UTC | 18% |
| 2 Oct, 07:15 UTC | 19% |
| 2 Oct, 06:11 UTC | 17% |
| 2 Oct, 04:52 UTC | 16% |
| 2 Oct, 02:23 UTC | 12% |
| 2 Oct, 01:20 UTC | 16% |
| 2 Oct, 00:43 UTC | 15% |
| 1 Oct, 21:46 UTC | 14% |
| 1 Oct, 19:48 UTC | 12% |
| 1 Oct, 18:50 UTC | 12% |
| 1 Oct, 18:29 UTC | 13% |
| 1 Oct, 13:30 UTC | 11% |
| 1 Oct, 06:22 UTC | 13% |
| 30 Sept, 19:09 UTC | 11% |
| 30 Sept, 18:54 UTC | 12% |
| 30 Sept, 16:18 UTC | 14% |
| 30 Sept, 15:15 UTC | 16% |
| 30 Sept, 14:50 UTC | 14% |
| 30 Sept, 11:18 UTC | 17% |
| 30 Sept, 09:44 UTC | 17% |
| 30 Sept, 09:04 UTC | 19% |
| 30 Sept, 04:55 UTC | 18% |
| 30 Sept, 03:56 UTC | 20% |
| 30 Sept, 02:44 UTC | 19% |
| 30 Sept, 02:21 UTC | 17% |
| 29 Sept, 23:00 UTC | 18% |
| 29 Sept, 19:54 UTC | 17% |
| 29 Sept, 19:10 UTC | 16% |
| 29 Sept, 17:25 UTC | 15% |
| 29 Sept, 16:39 UTC | 12% |
| 29 Sept, 16:23 UTC | 13% |
| 29 Sept, 08:34 UTC | 23% |
| 29 Sept, 07:26 UTC | 24% |
| 29 Sept, 06:22 UTC | 22% |
| 29 Sept, 05:53 UTC | 25% |
| 28 Sept, 13:30 UTC | 20% |
| 28 Sept, 03:57 UTC | 23% |
| 28 Sept, 01:03 UTC | 24% |
| 27 Sept, 23:37 UTC | 18% |
| 27 Sept, 20:43 UTC | 23% |
| 27 Sept, 13:29 UTC | 25% |
| 27 Sept, 01:24 UTC | 26% |
| 26 Sept, 15:40 UTC | 27% |
| 26 Sept, 03:46 UTC | 26% |
| 25 Sept, 23:29 UTC | 27% |
| 25 Sept, 16:19 UTC | 24% |
| 25 Sept, 15:08 UTC | 24% |
| 25 Sept, 12:38 UTC | 26% |
| 25 Sept, 12:04 UTC | 19% |
| 25 Sept, 09:24 UTC | 24% |
| 25 Sept, 08:46 UTC | 19% |
| 25 Sept, 05:43 UTC | 25% |
| 25 Sept, 03:17 UTC | 21% |
| 25 Sept, 01:33 UTC | 26% |
| 25 Sept, 01:26 UTC | 25% |
| 24 Sept, 23:59 UTC | 24% |
| 24 Sept, 21:10 UTC | 23% |
| 24 Sept, 20:10 UTC | 20% |
| 24 Sept, 12:55 UTC | 17% |
| 24 Sept, 05:05 UTC | 18% |
| 24 Sept, 03:46 UTC | 16% |
| 24 Sept, 03:07 UTC | 15% |
| 23 Sept, 20:13 UTC | 14% |
| 23 Sept, 17:11 UTC | 16% |
| 23 Sept, 16:27 UTC | 15% |
| 23 Sept, 15:37 UTC | 13% |
| 22 Sept, 14:27 UTC | 23% |
Replay the odds, article by article
Step through each article in the order it published and watch Digger respond.
The story so far
4 publishers have covered this in 4 articles since 11 Oct 2026. Variety published first, on 11 October at 18:37 UTC; BBC Entertainment followed 16h 52m later. The most recent article, from Features – IndieWire, appeared on 12 October at 13:00 UTC.
Outlets reporting it: Variety (major outlet), The Guardian (major outlet), BBC Entertainment, Features – IndieWire.
3 prediction markets price this story:
- Digger — the market puts it at 30%, with $5k traded in the last 24 hours, closing 31 Dec 2027. The market resolves to Yes if the film Digger receives a nomination for Best Picture at the 99th Academy Awards. Otherwise, it resolves to No. Readers often mistake the premiere date or critical reception for the resolution criteria, but only an official Oscar nomination counts.
- Digger — the market puts it at 18%, with $352 traded in the last 24 hours, closing 31 Dec 2027. The market resolves to Yes if the film Digger receives a nomination for Best Cinematography at the 99th Academy Awards. It resolves to No if it does not receive that specific nomination. Readers often mistake the premiere date or critical reception for the resolution criteria, but only an official Oscar nomination counts.
- Digger — the market puts it at 24%, with $5 traded in the last 24 hours, closing 31 Dec 2027. The market resolves to Yes if the film Digger receives a nomination for Best Original Screenplay at the 99th Academy Awards. Otherwise, it resolves to No. Readers often mistake the premiere or critical reception for the resolution criteria, but only an official Oscar nomination counts.
Odds are the market's probability that the outcome happens, updated every few minutes. They are information about what traders expect, not a forecast we make and not investment advice.
How it unfolded
Every source in the order it published, with the odds on Digger at that moment. A dash means the source published before we started tracking prices.
- VarietyTom Cruise’s ‘Digger’ Now Stands to Lose $245 Million After Dropping 60% in Second Weekend22%
- BBC EntertainmentTom Cruise film Digger could lose $245m at box office23%▲2 points since the previous source
- The GuardianDigger on course for $245m loss after box office collapse22%▼1 points since the previous source
- Features – IndieWireWhy Seeing ‘Digger’ in VistaVision Could Change Your Mind About the Tom Cruise Box Office Flop22%
- Current odds30%
Sources
Every article we clustered into this story. Headlines link to the publisher.
- Digger on course for $245m loss after box office collapse The Guardian ·
- Tom Cruise’s ‘Digger’ Now Stands to Lose $245 Million After Dropping 60% in Second Weekend Variety ·
- Why Seeing ‘Digger’ in VistaVision Could Change Your Mind About the Tom Cruise Box Office Flop Features – IndieWire
- Tom Cruise film Digger could lose $245m at box office BBC Entertainment
Related prediction markets
Linked by software because they are about the same subject. Most ask a different question from the one this story reports, so read each market's own question. How often the link is right
- Kalshi Digger 30% −3
Does the market have this right?
Wrong market?
- Kalshi Digger 18% −9
Does the market have this right?
Wrong market?
- Kalshi Digger 24% −3
Does the market have this right?
Wrong market?
Have your say
Your call. How does this end?
Free, no money involved. Calls are scored against the market's price when you make them, so backing an underdog that wins scores most. Leaderboard · Your calls
Email me when the odds move
In this story
- Tom Cruise
- Alejandro G Iñárritu
- Digger