Judge Denies Motion to Acquit Lindsay Clancy of Murder After Mistrial
A Massachusetts judge rejected defense arguments that insufficient evidence proves Lindsay Clancy killed her three children, allowing a retrial to proceed.
Headline and summary written by an AI model from the linked articles; not reviewed by a person. How this was made
This story has stopped developing; this page is its permanent record. More from that day
The odds
Each tick is a source publishing on this story
Price data
| Time | Chance of yes |
|---|---|
| now | 3% |
| 2 Oct, 14:14 UTC | 3% |
| 1 Oct, 17:22 UTC | 3% |
| 1 Oct, 16:44 UTC | 3% |
| 1 Oct, 16:21 UTC | 3% |
| 1 Oct, 15:27 UTC | 3% |
| 1 Oct, 14:45 UTC | 3% |
| 1 Oct, 14:21 UTC | 3% |
| 1 Oct, 09:59 UTC | 3% |
| 1 Oct, 06:55 UTC | 3% |
| 1 Oct, 04:44 UTC | 4% |
| 1 Oct, 03:55 UTC | 4% |
| 1 Oct, 03:19 UTC | 4% |
| 1 Oct, 02:43 UTC | 4% |
| 1 Oct, 02:14 UTC | 4% |
| 1 Oct, 01:34 UTC | 4% |
| 1 Oct, 01:05 UTC | 4% |
| 1 Oct, 00:44 UTC | 4% |
| 30 Sept, 20:46 UTC | 4% |
| 30 Sept, 18:39 UTC | 4% |
| 30 Sept, 16:59 UTC | 4% |
| 30 Sept, 15:23 UTC | 5% |
| 30 Sept, 05:45 UTC | 5% |
| 30 Sept, 05:17 UTC | 5% |
| 30 Sept, 04:20 UTC | 5% |
| 30 Sept, 03:06 UTC | 5% |
| 30 Sept, 01:44 UTC | 5% |
| 30 Sept, 00:32 UTC | 5% |
| 29 Sept, 21:17 UTC | 5% |
| 29 Sept, 20:49 UTC | 4% |
| 29 Sept, 20:18 UTC | 4% |
| 29 Sept, 19:54 UTC | 5% |
| 29 Sept, 18:47 UTC | 4% |
| 29 Sept, 16:54 UTC | 5% |
| 29 Sept, 15:59 UTC | 5% |
| 29 Sept, 15:00 UTC | 5% |
| 29 Sept, 14:44 UTC | 5% |
| 29 Sept, 14:06 UTC | 5% |
| 29 Sept, 13:51 UTC | 5% |
| 29 Sept, 13:27 UTC | 5% |
| 29 Sept, 12:48 UTC | 5% |
| 29 Sept, 12:26 UTC | 6% |
| 29 Sept, 11:56 UTC | 6% |
| 29 Sept, 11:21 UTC | 6% |
| 29 Sept, 10:59 UTC | 6% |
| 29 Sept, 10:15 UTC | 6% |
| 29 Sept, 09:59 UTC | 6% |
| 29 Sept, 09:09 UTC | 6% |
| 29 Sept, 08:48 UTC | 6% |
| 29 Sept, 05:53 UTC | 6% |
| 28 Sept, 19:18 UTC | 6% |
| 28 Sept, 13:20 UTC | 6% |
| 28 Sept, 12:11 UTC | 6% |
| 28 Sept, 09:57 UTC | 7% |
| 28 Sept, 09:19 UTC | 7% |
| 28 Sept, 08:46 UTC | 6% |
| 28 Sept, 04:36 UTC | 6% |
| 28 Sept, 01:19 UTC | 6% |
| 28 Sept, 00:54 UTC | 6% |
| 27 Sept, 22:24 UTC | 6% |
| 27 Sept, 21:50 UTC | 5% |
| 27 Sept, 21:22 UTC | 5% |
| 27 Sept, 20:22 UTC | 5% |
| 27 Sept, 19:59 UTC | 5% |
| 27 Sept, 19:20 UTC | 5% |
| 27 Sept, 18:44 UTC | 5% |
| 27 Sept, 18:27 UTC | 5% |
| 27 Sept, 17:52 UTC | 5% |
| 27 Sept, 17:13 UTC | 5% |
| 27 Sept, 15:17 UTC | 5% |
| 27 Sept, 14:24 UTC | 5% |
| 27 Sept, 13:55 UTC | 5% |
| 27 Sept, 12:47 UTC | 5% |
| 27 Sept, 12:14 UTC | 5% |
| 27 Sept, 08:08 UTC | 5% |
| 26 Sept, 12:13 UTC | 5% |
| 26 Sept, 11:38 UTC | 5% |
| 26 Sept, 03:38 UTC | 5% |
| 26 Sept, 01:04 UTC | 5% |
| 24 Sept, 22:53 UTC | 5% |
| 24 Sept, 22:24 UTC | 5% |
| 24 Sept, 21:10 UTC | 5% |
| 24 Sept, 20:31 UTC | 5% |
| 24 Sept, 20:03 UTC | 5% |
| 24 Sept, 19:56 UTC | 5% |
| 24 Sept, 18:17 UTC | 5% |
| 24 Sept, 17:02 UTC | 5% |
| 24 Sept, 16:47 UTC | 5% |
| 24 Sept, 16:26 UTC | 5% |
| 24 Sept, 15:59 UTC | 5% |
| 24 Sept, 15:25 UTC | 5% |
| 24 Sept, 12:42 UTC | 5% |
| 24 Sept, 12:23 UTC | 5% |
| 24 Sept, 10:55 UTC | 5% |
| 24 Sept, 09:36 UTC | 5% |
| 24 Sept, 09:22 UTC | 5% |
| 24 Sept, 08:36 UTC | 5% |
| 24 Sept, 08:16 UTC | 5% |
| 24 Sept, 07:54 UTC | 5% |
| 24 Sept, 06:22 UTC | 5% |
| 24 Sept, 05:05 UTC | 5% |
| 24 Sept, 04:49 UTC | 5% |
| 24 Sept, 04:17 UTC | 5% |
| 24 Sept, 03:39 UTC | 5% |
| 24 Sept, 03:00 UTC | 5% |
| 24 Sept, 02:25 UTC | 5% |
| 24 Sept, 01:58 UTC | 5% |
| 24 Sept, 01:27 UTC | 5% |
| 24 Sept, 00:55 UTC | 5% |
| 24 Sept, 00:23 UTC | 5% |
| 23 Sept, 23:41 UTC | 5% |
| 23 Sept, 23:27 UTC | 5% |
| 23 Sept, 22:12 UTC | 6% |
| 23 Sept, 21:43 UTC | 5% |
| 23 Sept, 21:09 UTC | 6% |
| 23 Sept, 20:20 UTC | 5% |
| 23 Sept, 19:39 UTC | 5% |
| 23 Sept, 19:14 UTC | 5% |
| 23 Sept, 18:47 UTC | 5% |
| 23 Sept, 18:25 UTC | 5% |
| 23 Sept, 17:59 UTC | 5% |
| 23 Sept, 17:11 UTC | 5% |
| 23 Sept, 16:27 UTC | 5% |
| 23 Sept, 15:24 UTC | 5% |
| 23 Sept, 14:54 UTC | 5% |
| 23 Sept, 14:23 UTC | 5% |
| 23 Sept, 13:56 UTC | 5% |
| 23 Sept, 13:28 UTC | 5% |
| 22 Sept, 18:34 UTC | 5% |
| 22 Sept, 09:05 UTC | 5% |
| 22 Sept, 07:17 UTC | 5% |
| 22 Sept, 01:25 UTC | 5% |
| 22 Sept, 00:38 UTC | 5% |
| 21 Sept, 23:03 UTC | 5% |
| 21 Sept, 20:41 UTC | 5% |
| 21 Sept, 20:11 UTC | 5% |
| 21 Sept, 19:55 UTC | 5% |
| 21 Sept, 19:12 UTC | 5% |
| 21 Sept, 18:34 UTC | 5% |
| 21 Sept, 17:43 UTC | 5% |
| 21 Sept, 16:56 UTC | 5% |
| 21 Sept, 15:49 UTC | 5% |
| 21 Sept, 14:48 UTC | 5% |
| 21 Sept, 14:22 UTC | 5% |
| 21 Sept, 13:17 UTC | 5% |
| 21 Sept, 12:23 UTC | 5% |
| 21 Sept, 06:10 UTC | 6% |
| 21 Sept, 05:55 UTC | 5% |
| 21 Sept, 05:09 UTC | 5% |
| 21 Sept, 04:50 UTC | 5% |
| 21 Sept, 04:00 UTC | 6% |
| 21 Sept, 03:42 UTC | 5% |
| 21 Sept, 02:27 UTC | 5% |
| 21 Sept, 01:19 UTC | 5% |
| 21 Sept, 00:24 UTC | 5% |
| 20 Sept, 23:08 UTC | 5% |
| 20 Sept, 21:46 UTC | 5% |
| 20 Sept, 21:07 UTC | 5% |
| 20 Sept, 20:54 UTC | 5% |
| 20 Sept, 19:47 UTC | 5% |
| 20 Sept, 18:32 UTC | 5% |
| 20 Sept, 17:59 UTC | 5% |
| 20 Sept, 17:29 UTC | 5% |
| 20 Sept, 15:28 UTC | 5% |
| 19 Sept, 23:12 UTC | 6% |
| 19 Sept, 15:14 UTC | 6% |
| 19 Sept, 13:04 UTC | 6% |
| 19 Sept, 11:55 UTC | 6% |
| 19 Sept, 08:09 UTC | 6% |
| 16 Sept, 23:56 UTC | 6% |
| 16 Sept, 20:24 UTC | 6% |
| 16 Sept, 19:54 UTC | 6% |
| 16 Sept, 17:01 UTC | 6% |
| 16 Sept, 16:53 UTC | 6% |
| 16 Sept, 15:15 UTC | 6% |
| 16 Sept, 12:33 UTC | 6% |
| 16 Sept, 12:25 UTC | 6% |
| 16 Sept, 11:47 UTC | 6% |
| 16 Sept, 11:19 UTC | 6% |
| 16 Sept, 10:47 UTC | 6% |
| 16 Sept, 10:18 UTC | 6% |
| 16 Sept, 09:40 UTC | 6% |
| 16 Sept, 09:12 UTC | 6% |
| 16 Sept, 08:34 UTC | 6% |
| 16 Sept, 08:00 UTC | 6% |
| 16 Sept, 07:29 UTC | 6% |
| 16 Sept, 03:58 UTC | 6% |
| 15 Sept, 16:43 UTC | 6% |
| 15 Sept, 16:27 UTC | 6% |
| 15 Sept, 09:19 UTC | 6% |
| 15 Sept, 08:46 UTC | 6% |
| 15 Sept, 03:40 UTC | 6% |
| 15 Sept, 00:05 UTC | 6% |
| 14 Sept, 23:00 UTC | 6% |
| 14 Sept, 22:07 UTC | 6% |
| 14 Sept, 16:07 UTC | 6% |
| 14 Sept, 15:34 UTC | 6% |
| 14 Sept, 14:57 UTC | 6% |
| 14 Sept, 13:58 UTC | 6% |
| 14 Sept, 13:26 UTC | 6% |
| 14 Sept, 12:59 UTC | 6% |
| 14 Sept, 11:44 UTC | 6% |
| 14 Sept, 10:37 UTC | 6% |
| 14 Sept, 09:25 UTC | 6% |
| 14 Sept, 08:44 UTC | 6% |
| 14 Sept, 08:13 UTC | 6% |
| 14 Sept, 07:50 UTC | 6% |
| 14 Sept, 07:09 UTC | 6% |
| 14 Sept, 06:36 UTC | 6% |
| 14 Sept, 06:05 UTC | 6% |
| 14 Sept, 05:32 UTC | 6% |
| 14 Sept, 05:02 UTC | 6% |
| 14 Sept, 04:39 UTC | 6% |
| 14 Sept, 03:57 UTC | 6% |
| 14 Sept, 02:37 UTC | 6% |
| 14 Sept, 01:56 UTC | 6% |
| 14 Sept, 01:14 UTC | 6% |
| 14 Sept, 00:58 UTC | 6% |
| 14 Sept, 00:19 UTC | 6% |
| 13 Sept, 23:51 UTC | 6% |
| 13 Sept, 23:28 UTC | 6% |
| 13 Sept, 22:53 UTC | 6% |
| 13 Sept, 22:14 UTC | 6% |
| 13 Sept, 21:55 UTC | 6% |
| 13 Sept, 19:53 UTC | 6% |
| 13 Sept, 16:40 UTC | 6% |
| 13 Sept, 14:52 UTC | 6% |
| 13 Sept, 10:29 UTC | 6% |
| 13 Sept, 05:55 UTC | 6% |
| 13 Sept, 04:12 UTC | 6% |
| 13 Sept, 01:46 UTC | 6% |
| 12 Sept, 18:39 UTC | 6% |
Replay the odds, article by article
Step through each article in the order it published and watch Lindsay Clancy convicted of murder? respond.
The story so far
4 publishers have covered this in 6 articles since 29 Sept 2026. The Guardian US published first, on 29 September at 15:42 UTC; Rolling Stone followed 0 min later. The most recent article, from Rolling Stone, appeared on 1 October at 23:51 UTC.
Outlets reporting it: The Guardian US (major outlet), Rolling Stone, BBC Health, MedPageToday.com - medical news for physicians.
2 prediction markets price this story:
- Lindsay Clancy convicted of murder? — the market puts it at 3%, with $299 traded in the last 24 hours, closing 1 Jan 2027. The outcome is Yes if Lindsay Clancy receives a murder conviction in the initial trial or any retrial that starts before 11:59 PM ET. The outcome is No if she is acquitted, charges are dropped, or no judgment is rendered by the deadline. Readers often mistake the final appellate decision for the resolution source, but only the initial trial judgment counts.
- Lindsay Clancy convicted of manslaughter? — the market puts it at 5%, with $12 traded in the last 24 hours, closing 31 Dec 2026. The outcome is Yes if Lindsay Clancy receives a conviction for manslaughter in the Massachusetts case by December 31, 2026, or by the end of any retrial that starts before that date. The outcome is No if she is acquitted, charged with murder only, has charges dropped, or if no judgment occurs by the deadline.
Odds are the market's probability that the outcome happens, updated every few minutes. They are information about what traders expect, not a forecast we make and not investment advice.
How it unfolded
Every source in the order it published, with the odds on Lindsay Clancy convicted of murder? at that moment. A dash means the source published before we started tracking prices.
- The Guardian USLindsay Clancy returns to court after Massachusetts murder case mistrial5%
- Rolling StoneLindsay Clancy’s Lawyer Argues for Not Guilty Verdict: ‘Where Is the Evidence That She Did This?’5%
- BBC HealthHow Lindsay Clancy's return to court after mistrial unfolded5%▼1 points since the previous source
- MedPageToday.com - medical news for physiciansLindsay Clancy's Lawyer Now Questions Whether She Killed Her 3 Children4%
- The Guardian USJudge denies defense motion to declare Lindsay Clancy not guilty of murder3%▼1 points since the previous source
- Rolling StoneLindsay Clancy Lawyer’s Bid to Find Her Not Guilty After Mistrial Denied: Judge3%
- Current odds3%
Sources
Every article we clustered into this story. Headlines link to the publisher.
- Judge denies defense motion to declare Lindsay Clancy not guilty of murder The Guardian US ·
- Lindsay Clancy returns to court after Massachusetts murder case mistrial The Guardian US ·
- Lindsay Clancy Lawyer’s Bid to Find Her Not Guilty After Mistrial Denied: Judge Rolling Stone
- Lindsay Clancy's Lawyer Now Questions Whether She Killed Her 3 Children MedPageToday.com - medical news for physicians
- How Lindsay Clancy's return to court after mistrial unfolded BBC Health
- Lindsay Clancy’s Lawyer Argues for Not Guilty Verdict: ‘Where Is the Evidence That She Did This?’ Rolling Stone
Related prediction markets
Linked by software because they are about the same subject. Most ask a different question from the one this story reports, so read each market's own question. How often the link is right
- Polymarket Lindsay Clancy convicted of murder? 3%
Does the market have this right?
Wrong market?
- Polymarket Lindsay Clancy convicted of manslaughter? 5%
Does the market have this right?
Wrong market?
Have your say
Your call. How does this end?
Free, no money involved. Calls are scored against the market's price when you make them, so backing an underdog that wins scores most. Leaderboard · Your calls
Email me when the odds move
In this story
- Lindsay Clancy
- Kevin Reddington
- William Sullivan