Chelsea FC Co-Owners Settle Dispute With Robey as Mediator
Investment banker Simon Robey acted as key mediator to resolve the conflict between the club's co-owners.
Headline and summary written by an AI model from the linked article; not reviewed by a person. How this was made
This story has stopped developing; this page is its permanent record. More from that day
The odds
Each tick is a source publishing on this story
Price data
| Time | Chance of yes |
|---|---|
| now | 4% |
| 28 Oct, 10:16 UTC | 4% |
| 28 Oct, 06:20 UTC | 3% |
| 28 Oct, 03:50 UTC | 2% |
| 27 Oct, 13:48 UTC | 4% |
| 27 Oct, 05:06 UTC | 3% |
| 27 Oct, 03:19 UTC | 4% |
| 25 Oct, 22:54 UTC | 3% |
| 25 Oct, 16:28 UTC | 2% |
| 25 Oct, 15:46 UTC | 3% |
| 25 Oct, 12:49 UTC | 2% |
| 24 Oct, 20:51 UTC | 3% |
| 24 Oct, 19:17 UTC | 2% |
| 24 Oct, 18:29 UTC | 5% |
| 24 Oct, 13:29 UTC | 9% |
| 23 Oct, 15:06 UTC | 8% |
| 23 Oct, 08:00 UTC | 6% |
| 22 Oct, 09:47 UTC | 7% |
| 22 Oct, 03:02 UTC | 6% |
| 22 Oct, 02:47 UTC | 7% |
| 21 Oct, 17:27 UTC | 6% |
| 21 Oct, 05:13 UTC | 7% |
| 21 Oct, 00:22 UTC | 5% |
| 20 Oct, 23:57 UTC | 7% |
| 20 Oct, 18:59 UTC | 7% |
| 20 Oct, 17:10 UTC | 7% |
| 20 Oct, 15:58 UTC | 6% |
| 20 Oct, 12:46 UTC | 7% |
| 18 Oct, 17:38 UTC | 6% |
| 18 Oct, 17:17 UTC | 7% |
| 18 Oct, 16:10 UTC | 6% |
| 18 Oct, 15:22 UTC | 7% |
| 18 Oct, 13:30 UTC | 6% |
| 18 Oct, 12:34 UTC | 7% |
| 18 Oct, 09:26 UTC | 6% |
| 18 Oct, 04:50 UTC | 7% |
| 18 Oct, 01:23 UTC | 6% |
| 17 Oct, 21:25 UTC | 7% |
| 17 Oct, 18:50 UTC | 6% |
| 17 Oct, 16:52 UTC | 7% |
| 17 Oct, 15:15 UTC | 6% |
| 17 Oct, 14:54 UTC | 7% |
| 17 Oct, 13:56 UTC | 6% |
| 17 Oct, 12:20 UTC | 7% |
| 16 Oct, 22:03 UTC | 5% |
| 16 Oct, 16:39 UTC | 7% |
| 16 Oct, 15:24 UTC | 6% |
| 16 Oct, 13:03 UTC | 7% |
| 16 Oct, 10:49 UTC | 5% |
| 16 Oct, 05:42 UTC | 7% |
| 16 Oct, 04:56 UTC | 6% |
| 16 Oct, 03:36 UTC | 5% |
| 16 Oct, 02:48 UTC | 6% |
| 16 Oct, 01:02 UTC | 7% |
| 15 Oct, 22:49 UTC | 6% |
| 15 Oct, 21:34 UTC | 7% |
| 15 Oct, 20:52 UTC | 6% |
| 15 Oct, 14:50 UTC | 7% |
| 15 Oct, 00:09 UTC | 5% |
| 14 Oct, 21:56 UTC | 6% |
| 14 Oct, 21:06 UTC | 7% |
| 14 Oct, 20:18 UTC | 6% |
| 13 Oct, 15:31 UTC | 5% |
| 13 Oct, 11:27 UTC | 7% |
| 13 Oct, 04:34 UTC | 6% |
| 12 Oct, 21:33 UTC | 5% |
| 12 Oct, 17:49 UTC | 6% |
| 12 Oct, 15:07 UTC | 7% |
| 11 Oct, 19:33 UTC | 6% |
| 11 Oct, 19:24 UTC | 7% |
| 11 Oct, 17:57 UTC | 7% |
| 11 Oct, 15:49 UTC | 6% |
| 11 Oct, 12:05 UTC | 7% |
| 11 Oct, 09:40 UTC | 6% |
| 11 Oct, 07:08 UTC | 7% |
| 11 Oct, 03:45 UTC | 6% |
| 10 Oct, 21:12 UTC | 7% |
| 10 Oct, 16:54 UTC | 5% |
| 10 Oct, 14:41 UTC | 6% |
| 10 Oct, 14:20 UTC | 7% |
| 9 Oct, 20:20 UTC | 5% |
| 9 Oct, 09:20 UTC | 4% |
| 8 Oct, 03:48 UTC | 5% |
| 7 Oct, 20:22 UTC | 4% |
| 7 Oct, 07:20 UTC | 5% |
| 6 Oct, 17:53 UTC | 4% |
| 6 Oct, 03:48 UTC | 5% |
| 6 Oct, 00:23 UTC | 4% |
| 5 Oct, 23:29 UTC | 3% |
| 5 Oct, 15:14 UTC | 4% |
| 5 Oct, 04:13 UTC | 5% |
| 5 Oct, 03:07 UTC | 3% |
| 4 Oct, 23:51 UTC | 4% |
| 4 Oct, 23:25 UTC | 5% |
| 4 Oct, 01:07 UTC | 4% |
| 4 Oct, 00:47 UTC | 5% |
| 4 Oct, 00:08 UTC | 4% |
| 3 Oct, 17:00 UTC | 5% |
| 3 Oct, 15:34 UTC | 4% |
| 1 Oct, 17:14 UTC | 5% |
| 1 Oct, 16:44 UTC | 4% |
| 1 Oct, 06:36 UTC | 5% |
| 1 Oct, 06:15 UTC | 4% |
| 30 Sept, 12:38 UTC | 5% |
| 30 Sept, 12:24 UTC | 4% |
| 30 Sept, 08:35 UTC | 5% |
| 29 Sept, 23:46 UTC | 4% |
| 29 Sept, 18:39 UTC | 5% |
| 29 Sept, 16:07 UTC | 4% |
| 27 Sept, 15:03 UTC | 5% |
| 26 Sept, 22:14 UTC | 5% |
| 26 Sept, 16:48 UTC | 5% |
| 26 Sept, 11:20 UTC | 6% |
| 25 Sept, 22:40 UTC | 5% |
| 25 Sept, 19:25 UTC | 6% |
| 25 Sept, 18:07 UTC | 5% |
| 25 Sept, 14:39 UTC | 6% |
| 25 Sept, 14:16 UTC | 5% |
| 25 Sept, 12:18 UTC | 4% |
| 25 Sept, 01:06 UTC | 5% |
| 23 Sept, 13:38 UTC | 4% |
| 22 Sept, 13:09 UTC | 5% |
The story so far
1 publisher has covered this in 1 article since 8 Oct 2026. Bloomberg Markets published first, on 8 October at 06:30 UTC.
3 prediction markets price this story:
- Chelsea — the market puts it at 4%, with $451 traded in the last 24 hours, closing 13 Jun 2027. The market resolves to Yes if Chelsea wins the 2026-27 English Premier League title. It resolves to No if they do not win that specific championship. Readers often mistake this for a prediction of their current performance or future seasons rather than the definitive outcome of the 2026-27 league.
- Chelsea — resolved “No” on 28 Oct 2026. Chelsea must win the 2026-27 EFL Carabao Cup for the outcome to be Yes. Winning any other trophy or finishing as league champion does not count. The resolution depends solely on the final result of this specific cup competition.
- Chelsea — the market puts it at 11%, with $43 traded in the last 24 hours, closing 5 Jun 2027. The market resolves to Yes if Chelsea wins the 2026-2027 FA Cup. It resolves to No if they do not win that specific tournament. Readers often mistake this for a prediction of any match result, but only the final FA Cup title matters.
Odds are the market's probability that the outcome happens, updated every few minutes. They are information about what traders expect, not a forecast we make and not investment advice.
Sources
Every article we clustered into this story. Headlines link to the publisher.
Related prediction markets
Linked by software because they are about the same subject. Most ask a different question from the one this story reports, so read each market's own question. How often the link is right
- Kalshi Chelsea 4%
Does the market have this right?
Wrong market?
- Resolved Chelsea No 9d ago
The market favoured No at 85% a day out, and it won. How often it's right
Wrong market?
- Kalshi Chelsea 11%
Does the market have this right?
Wrong market?
Have your say
Your call. How does this end?
Free, no money involved. Calls are scored against the market's price when you make them, so backing an underdog that wins scores most. Leaderboard · Your calls
Email me when the odds move
In this story
- Chelsea FC
- Robey
- Simon Robey