Burnham's pub drinking comment dismissed as personal opinion not policy
The prime minister clarified that his remarks on having a drink in the stands were a personal view rather than an attempt to shape government policy.
Headline and summary written by an AI model from the linked article; not reviewed by a person. How this was made
This story has stopped developing; this page is its permanent record. More from that day
The odds
Each tick is a source publishing on this story
Price data
| Time | Chance of yes |
|---|---|
| now | 1% |
| 14 Oct, 12:06 UTC | 1% |
| 14 Oct, 11:52 UTC | 40% |
| 14 Oct, 11:17 UTC | 62% |
| 14 Oct, 10:43 UTC | 49% |
| 14 Oct, 10:12 UTC | 72% |
| 14 Oct, 09:58 UTC | 54% |
| 14 Oct, 09:17 UTC | 50% |
| 14 Oct, 08:03 UTC | 54% |
| 14 Oct, 06:49 UTC | 55% |
| 14 Oct, 04:34 UTC | 53% |
| 14 Oct, 04:20 UTC | 54% |
| 14 Oct, 03:35 UTC | 53% |
| 14 Oct, 03:15 UTC | 52% |
| 14 Oct, 02:42 UTC | 55% |
| 14 Oct, 02:15 UTC | 57% |
| 13 Oct, 23:33 UTC | 61% |
| 13 Oct, 21:37 UTC | 57% |
| 13 Oct, 16:33 UTC | 59% |
| 13 Oct, 15:31 UTC | 60% |
| 13 Oct, 14:56 UTC | 57% |
| 13 Oct, 13:33 UTC | 60% |
| 13 Oct, 13:25 UTC | 59% |
| 13 Oct, 10:08 UTC | 55% |
| 13 Oct, 09:53 UTC | 59% |
| 13 Oct, 07:28 UTC | 58% |
| 13 Oct, 01:48 UTC | 56% |
| 12 Oct, 23:08 UTC | 60% |
| 12 Oct, 19:56 UTC | 58% |
| 12 Oct, 16:45 UTC | 60% |
| 12 Oct, 12:11 UTC | 61% |
| 12 Oct, 07:47 UTC | 53% |
| 11 Oct, 14:42 UTC | 60% |
| 11 Oct, 08:25 UTC | 53% |
| 11 Oct, 01:04 UTC | 57% |
| 11 Oct, 00:39 UTC | 58% |
| 10 Oct, 18:52 UTC | 57% |
| 10 Oct, 10:31 UTC | 54% |
| 10 Oct, 09:48 UTC | 53% |
| 10 Oct, 03:47 UTC | 52% |
| 9 Oct, 18:20 UTC | 53% |
| 9 Oct, 02:28 UTC | 54% |
| 8 Oct, 20:19 UTC | 53% |
| 8 Oct, 15:04 UTC | 51% |
| 7 Oct, 00:35 UTC | 50% |
| 6 Oct, 20:30 UTC | 51% |
| 5 Oct, 23:09 UTC | 52% |
| 4 Oct, 19:00 UTC | 54% |
| 3 Oct, 19:42 UTC | 53% |
| 3 Oct, 08:30 UTC | 52% |
| 3 Oct, 05:16 UTC | 54% |
| 2 Oct, 20:45 UTC | 53% |
| 30 Sept, 18:54 UTC | 46% |
| 29 Sept, 18:47 UTC | 50% |
| 29 Sept, 12:18 UTC | 52% |
| 29 Sept, 05:53 UTC | 58% |
| 28 Sept, 19:18 UTC | 51% |
| 28 Sept, 13:20 UTC | 55% |
| 28 Sept, 04:07 UTC | 39% |
| 28 Sept, 00:22 UTC | 29% |
| 25 Sept, 22:02 UTC | 23% |
| 25 Sept, 21:41 UTC | 17% |
| 24 Sept, 20:24 UTC | 13% |
| 24 Sept, 15:11 UTC | 15% |
| 23 Sept, 19:21 UTC | 14% |
| 23 Sept, 15:54 UTC | 12% |
| 23 Sept, 14:40 UTC | 11% |
| 23 Sept, 12:23 UTC | 19% |
| 22 Sept, 11:59 UTC | 13% |
The story so far
1 publisher has covered this in 1 article since 26 Sept 2026. The Guardian Sport published first, on 26 September at 07:00 UTC.
One prediction market prices this story:
- Reform — resolved “No” on 14 Oct 2026. The market resolves to Yes if Andy Burnham explicitly uses the word "Reform" while speaking during Prime Minister's Questions in the UK House of Commons. It resolves to No if he does not say that specific word during that session. Readers often mistake any mention of Reform elsewhere for a win, but only utterances during PMQs count.
Odds are the market's probability that the outcome happens, updated every few minutes. They are information about what traders expect, not a forecast we make and not investment advice.
Sources
Every article we clustered into this story. Headlines link to the publisher.
Related prediction markets
Linked by software because they are about the same subject. Most ask a different question from the one this story reports, so read each market's own question. How often the link is right
- Resolved Reform No 24d ago
The market favoured Yes at 60% a day out, but No won. How often it's right
Wrong market?
In this story
- Andy Burnham